Aidroos Al Zubaidi

التالى السابق

Unite for Tolerance & Human Fraternity to Combat Terrorism & Extremism

Analytics - منذ 3 ساعات

The Statement of Aidroos Al Zubaidi

South Eye | Analysis - Exclusive

The online participation of President Aidroos Al-Zubaidi in the Union for Tolerance and Human Fraternity Against Extremism Forum in Geneva marks a significant moment in the ongoing efforts to combat terrorism and promote regional stability. Organized by the International Organization for the Least Developed Countries, the forum gathers global leaders, policymakers, and experts to address extremism and foster global cooperation in countering radical ideologies. Al-Zubaidi's participation at this event is a Collaborative statement & an opportunity to solidify the Southern cause on the international stage.

His speech focused on several critical themes, emphasizing the commitment of Southern forces to countering terrorism, particularly against organizations such as Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and the Houthis. He highlighted the tangible sacrifices made by the people of the South, referencing the 6,794 martyrs and wounded individuals who have fallen victim to terrorism. This statistic is crucial, why? Because it underscores the reality of the conflict and places the South at the forefront of the global fight against extremism. His statement that these extremist groups are a continuation of elements that emerged after the 1990 unification is a direct accusation against the policies that led to the marginalization of the South and allowed extremist networks to thrive in order to keep their control through many strategies.

Al-Zubaidi's emphasis on the limited resources of Southern forces and their ability to achieve victories despite constraints serves a dual purpose. On the one hand, it emphasizes the South as a determined and capable force in the war on terror. On the other, it sends a urgent message to the international community that further support and investment are necessary. This ties into his broader strategy of positioning the Southern cause as a regional issue & an integral part of international security concerns. By framing the conflict in this manner, he strengthens the argument for recognition of the South as a key player in counterterrorism.

A major takeaway from his speech was the call for a coordinated international response. This reflects an understanding that the war on terror cannot be won in isolation and that Southern forces require strategic alliances. His participation in the forum provides an opportunity to forge deeper ties with Western nations, particularly those with vested interests in counterterrorism operations in the Middle East and Africa. Countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and France which have maintained a military and intelligence presence in the region are likely to view the Southern forces as an asset in securing maritime routes and preventing the expansion of terrorist networks.

The presence of regional actors at the forum adds another layer of significance. Nations like UAE & Saudi Arabia, which have been instrumental in supporting the Southern forces, see Al-Zubaidi’s participation as an endorsement of their broader anti-terrorism strategy. His statements align with the Gulf states’ vision of countering Iranian influence through the dismantling of groups like the Houthis. Additionally, his emphasis on Southern forces as a stabilizing factor in region's future is in line with the Gulf’s long-term security objectives.

For the European Union, which has been increasingly concerned about terrorism-related migration and radicalization within its borders, Al-Zubaidi’s remarks present an opportunity to reassess the security dynamics in the region. If the South is seen as a legitimate force against terrorism, there is a higher likelihood that European policymakers will consider engaging with the Southern Transitional Council (STC) in a more diplomatic and financial capacity. His participation allows for networking with European figures who may advocate for Southern autonomy as a stabilizing measure.

One of the most strategic aspects of his speech was the connection between terrorism and governance. He subtly argued that the failure to address the Southern issue has allowed extremist groups to flourish. By framing the Southern struggle as one of self-determination against terrorism, he makes a compelling case for the international legitimacy of the Southern people's cause. If the South can be positioned as a future partner in stability which locally it has done in fact, it increases the chances of gaining diplomatic recognition.

The inclusion of humanitarian themes, particularly references to civilian casualties, adds another layer of credibility, because the civilians must be protected according to IHL. While military victories are crucial, the humanitarian cost of extremism is a universal concern that resonates with Western audiences. This strategic messaging ensures that his participation is about military achievements & the broader vision of a peaceful and tolerant South.

From the perspective of international counterterrorism coalitions, Al-Zubaidi’s statements are valuable because they highlight a less-discussed front in the global war on terror. While much attention is given to counterterrorism efforts in the Sahel, Syria, and Iraq, Yemen’s Southern region is often overlooked. By drawing attention to the role that Southern forces have played, Al-Zubaidi is making a case for greater integration into international security frameworks.

The United Nations and other multilateral organizations will likely take note of his speech, especially in relation to human rights concerns. If the Southern forces continue to emphasize a commitment to tolerance, stability and peace, there is a chance that the UN’s stance on the region could shift to be more inclusive of fair Southern people aspirations. However, this will largely depend on diplomatic follow-ups and whether the Southern leadership can sustain international engagement beyond events like this forum.

Al-Zubaidi’s participation in Geneva is a testament to the increasing international legitimacy of the Southern people cause. It is also a strategic step in ensuring that Southern people's voices are heard in discussions that impact region’s future. By framing the Southern struggle as a fight against terrorism, extremism, and instability, for sure he strengthens the case for international partnerships, military support, and eventual political recognition. The success of this approach will depend on the extent to which Southern leaders can convert diplomatic engagements into tangible policy shifts from global powers.