Western Ally

التالى السابق

Who is beyond the global policies imposing

REPORTS - منذ 7 أيام

Who is behind the deep states and internal policies and supporting people and groups to rise to power?

 Examining global politics, especially through the lens of deep state influences, international drug and arms trafficking, and the rise to power of populist leaders, reveals complex interactions that transcend traditional East-West divisions.

  The concept of the deep state refers to influential networks within or around governments, including private organizations, intelligence agencies, and large corporations. They often pursue long-term goals regardless of whether officials are elected or not, focusing on national security, economic dominance, or ideological goals. Many researchers believe that Western countries, especially the United States, have a long history of influential networks that guide their foreign policy. However, countries like Russia and China also have similar structures, influencing global politics for decades. For example, Russian influence has been observed in Eastern Europe and parts of the Middle East, although the general nature of Russia and China is that they support governments that represent the people and escalate the struggle directly.

 

 In another context, arms smuggling and drug trafficking, in which drug and weapons trafficking are often intertwined with political agendas. In Latin America, regions such as Colombia and Brazil have suffered from the drug trade, which affects politics and security at the global level. In addition, arms smuggling affects conflict zones around the world, including southern Yemen and Iraq, where reports indicate that Western and Eastern players may be indirectly involved. For example, proxy conflicts between Saudi Arabia and Iran driven by major states (which support the Houthis in northern Yemen) have led to weapons smuggling to different factions. In Southeast Asia, Indonesia has faced similar challenges with regard to arms and drug trafficking, where internal instability is sometimes linked to foreign influence, in addition to such events in Egypt, which has seized quantities of unlicensed weapons, and Saudi Arabia has also repeatedly reported attempts involving... Events like this.

 On the other hand, the imposition of people in governments and authority

 As an example, leaders such as Imran Khan in Pakistan who spent his youth in UK, Zelensky in Ukraine, and the Houthi leadership in northern Yemen, as well as Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood which has a license to operate in UK, these have used religion or nationalism as rallying points. These leaders usually emphasize issues that resonate with the general public, such as sovereignty and opposition to US intervention in Pakistan, which Imran Khan called for immediately after entering politics, or the fight against corruption, which the Houthis used during the revolution in 2014. Imran Khan’s political position emphasized sovereignty and discourse. Anti-Westernism in Pakistan. Likewise, the Houthis use anti-Western and anti-Saudi messages to mobilize northern Yemenis. What is common between Imran Khan, the Houthis and the Muslim Brotherhood is that they use the Palestine issue in their speeches immediately after anything happens. In Ukraine, Zelensky was famous among the Ukrainian people, and when he was nominated, this strengthened the people’s acceptance of him in a positive way. Likewise, Imran Khan, who is considered a famous cricketer in Pakistan, especially after his success in the 1990s, and in South Yemen as well. The current government officials in Aden, US & UK have interests from them holding on to some figures in the government, especially those who studied in the United Kingdom and the United States, but this certainly does not justify this being at the expense of Peoples, while there are better alternatives that guarantee common interests.

Often, populist and Islamist movements take advantage of international issues, such as Palestine or opposition to Western intervention, to appeal to nationalist or religious sentiments, which may be motivated to increase their chances of success at the behest of major powers. In the Middle East, for example, the Muslim Brotherhood gained influence by promoting opposition to Western-backed regimes. Many analysts see larger geopolitical players exploiting these movements to destabilize governments or influence regional influence.

  Many of these dynamics are influenced by geopolitical agendas that remain hidden from public view. For example, both the United States and the United Kingdom seek to influence strategic regions through indirect support for particular factions, movements, or leaders. This influence is seen in Ukraine, where Western countries support Zelensky against Russian interests, and in northern Yemen, where the Saudi-Houthi conflict reflects larger proxy interests between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Likewise, in countries like Pakistan, internal instability may sometimes be due to competing foreign influences complicating internal politics and leading to the rise of people to power at will by external interventions.

 In short, these dynamics point to a multipolar world where different powers interact through deep-rooted networks, often outside visible governmental structures. Global influence between West and East has never led to balance, but rather deepened conflicts as states and non-state actors manipulate internal factions to advance their interests. The result is a world in which populist leaders, state-backed networks, and secret agendas interact in ways that blur national lines and complicate the global political landscape, while people remain victims of the deep state, crises, media, and scenarios from which citizens will have no way out.

 It is not unlikely that Saudi Arabia will be part of the plan, and we have examples in Iraq, Libya, DRC, Afghanistan, Somalia and Tunisia.

Here this question arises: Who do people trust? Is it the nationalist, dictatorial Eastern bloc - or the liberal democratic Western bloc?

In this context, the Western bloc seems more logical especially after its success in some countries such UAE South Korea, Singapore, but the long-term and agendas of this bloc are making societies lose confidence. Hence. Is it time to work more transparently or the south will be a second Iraq!